Background
Notes about The Hollow
Kingdom
By Clare B. Dunkle. New York: Henry
Holt, 2003. 230p.
Because I live in a foreign country and because my children are
being educated in a culture to which they do not belong by birth,
I am very sensitive about the importance of cultural diversity.
The Hollow Kingdom is a fantasy novel that helps teens
explore in a nonthreatening way complex cultural-diversity questions.
The book touches on issues of race (including racial stereotyping
and ideas of beauty and worth), issues of culture (including culture
shock and socialization), and prejudice, both racial and cultural.
Kate, for instance, seems broad minded, but she assumes that because
Marak is ugly, his home must be ugly as well. She also assumes that
because he is an outsider to her society, he will naturally be a
barbarian. She is very upset to learn that she herself is not a
member of the race that she has been raised to think of as “ideal,”
and she goes on to have trouble dealing with the goblin culture,
which employs its own naming conventions, table manners, aesthetics,
and taboos. Only when she returns to her society does she realize
how much she values the goblins.
Marak, for his part, is highly educated, but he holds biased ideas
about the other races and relates these prejudices without guilt.
He obviously believes that he is part of a “superior”
race. The goblins’ prejudices have caused at least one member
of their society shame and misery. Seylin, who looks like an elf
child, has been teased and ostracized by his peers. He has no friend
besides his King, who pities him for being what he is, until Emily,
an outsider raised without his culture’s prejudices, comes
to live in the kingdom.
I wrote this trilogy because my mother read a great deal of history
to me when I was a child, and one of the historical phenomena which
fascinated and terrified me was the abduction of foreign or captured
women and their integration into a new society. Every country on
earth has participated in the forcible integration of women into
a captor society at one time or another, a fact that must amaze
and horrify us. When I was a child, I wondered how that could possibly
work. Would the woman try to hold onto her own cultural identity,
or would she adopt a new one? Drawing on the voluminous British
folklore tradition of the abduction of human women, I tried to work
that scenario out for myself in this book.
Does this book argue in favor of abduction? Of course not, no more
than a book that describes battlefield behavior is arguing in favor
of war. Moreover, the magical problem my goblins face is so unique
that it has no human counterpart. And yet, for reasons ranging from
logical to heinous, our own culture has repeatedly taken innocent
foreign women captive and held them or exploited them for our society’s
benefit. In the 1800’s, we did this to African women and native
American women. Last century, we interned Japanese American women
during World War II. And right this minute, although the majority
of our Middle Eastern captives are men, a few of them are women.
So, clearly, we Americans have some things to think through in terms
of the ethical treatment of foreign women. If we take the time to
examine these issues honestly in a complicated fictional setting,
that’s a useful step toward getting them right in real life.
To that end, if my trilogy forces readers towards new thoughts
aboutrace and identity, as well as reasonable interaction between
“us” and “them,” then I will be very happy.
Webpage text copyright 2008 by Clare
B. Dunkle. Permission is given to print this page for educational
or private use, provided that the author is acknowledged on the
printed copy. It is forbidden to copy, distribute, or use this text
in electronic form. This text may not be emailed or used on another
webpage. |